Coco before Chanel (12A), Anne Fontaine, 110 mins

Reviewed,Anthony Quinn
Friday 31 July 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Anne Fontaine's biopic of a woman who would become the grande dame of 20th-century couture looks very beautiful, and Audrey Tautou in the title role retains a cool mystique.

Yet, unlike her famous designs, this lacks structure, texture and interest. The young Gabrielle Chanel (Coco was a later nickname), abandoned in an orphanage on her mother's death, starts out as a singer and part-time seamstress in provincial France, then decides to hitch her star to an affluent playboy, Balsan (Benoît Poelvoorde). She moves into his baronial country house, occupying an anomalous (and coyly unexplained) position between upstairs and downstairs – she eats with the staff, but drinks and carouses with Balsan's toff polo-playing friends, one of whom, an English businessman named Boy Capel (Alessandro Nivola), becomes her lover.

In the meantime she dresses herself in trousers, gets busy with the draper's scissors and gives the world the Little Black Dress. Yet there's a gaping hole where a plausible psychology ought to be. Despite her vaunted pride and independence, she was not so proud or independent to refrain from sponging off men. Perhaps that was the only way she could get ahead, but the film could have been more incisive in examining this compromise.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in