Capitalism: A Love Story (12A)
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michael Moore's new documentary doesn't just lay into the bankers behind the recent financial Armageddon.
He starts by relating the gradual erosion of America's manufacturing base to the rise of Ronald Reagan, in the pockets of big financiers. We're shown the head of Merrill Lynch standing beside Reagan and telling him, mid-speech, "You're gonna have to speed it up." Who the hell, asks Moore, tells a President to speed it up? From there, he roars off in a dozen directions, filming from the inside as private homes are repossessed, showing how companies are asset-stripped and banks exist above the law. There are eye-opening revelations: some companies insure the lives of employees and make millions from their demise (the unfortunates are called "Dead Peasants" in the small print), and teenagers are locked up by corrupt judges for microscopic crimes in cash-for-conviction prisons. The story of how Congress was forced to vote for a $700bn bailout of the banks (without any explanation of how the money might be spent) is re-told, to jaw-dropping effect. Moore is marvellously indignant and confrontational (he tries to make a citizen's arrest of the AIG board), and dramatises moments of rebellion and fight-back with relish. But there's something self-righteous and teenage-lefty about his rhetoric. He ends with a virtual call to arms, and calls for "the opposite of capitalism – democracy". But surely the opposite of capitalism is communism or socialism. Why doesn't he call for that?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments