Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wonder Woman director Patty Jenkins responds to James Cameron calling the film a 'step backwards'

'If women have to always be hard, tough and troubled to be strong, and we aren't free to be multidimensional or celebrate an icon of women everywhere because she is attractive and loving, then we haven't come very far have we'

Christopher Hooton
Friday 25 August 2017 08:35 BST
Comments
Gal Gadot is the Amazon warrior in the new 'Wonder Woman' film
Gal Gadot is the Amazon warrior in the new 'Wonder Woman' film (Clay Enos/Warner Bros)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Patty Jenkins has hit back at James Cameron after he said he felt the new Wonder Woman film was a "step backward" for the portrayal of women on screen.

"All of the self-congratulatory back-patting Hollywood’s been doing over ‘Wonder Woman’ has been so misguided," he told the Guardian. “She’s an objectified icon, and it’s just male Hollywood doing the same old thing!

"I’m not saying I didn’t like the movie but, to me, it’s a step backwards," he added.

Jenkins last night tweeted a page of text on Twitter, which read (sic): "James Cameron's inability to understand what Wonder Woman is, or stands for, to women all over the world is unsurprising as, though he is a great filmmaker, he is not a woman. Strong women are great. His praise of my film Monster, and our portrayal of a strong yet damaged woman was so appreciated. But if women have to always be hard, tough and troubled to be strong, and we aren't free to be multidimensional or celebrate an icon of women everywhere because she is attractive and loving, then we haven't come very far have we. I believe women can and should be EVERYTHING just like male lead characters should be. There is no right and wrong kind of powerful woman. And the massive female audience who made the film a hit it is, can surely choose and judge their own icons of progress."

Cameron's original criticism came out of a discussion around the re-release of Terminator 2: Judgement Day.

“Sarah Connor was not a beauty icon," he said. "She was strong, she was troubled, she was a terrible mother, and she earned the respect of the audience through pure grit. And to me, [the benefit of characters like Sarah] is so obvious. I mean, half the audience is female!"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in