Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.It always sounded like a stretch for a director who tends to be fascinated by action heroes, terrifying monsters, and touching historical tragedies. Now Steven Spielberg has abandoned plans for his next career-defining film to involve the exploits of a six-foot-tall imaginary rabbit.
The Hollywood mogul revealed yesterday that he had resigned from a remake of the classic James Stewart film Harvey, just weeks before it was due to go into production, after struggling to persuade a sufficiently weighty lead actor to back the project.
According to Variety, first Tom Hanks, pictured with Spielberg, and then Robert Downey Jr considered the starring role – a middle-aged man convinced that his best friend is an invisible bunny – but refused to commit.
Downey even suggested a series of alterations to Spielberg's script, which had been adapted from one that helped garner Stewart a best actor Oscar nomination in 1951, before deciding to pass altogether.
Spielberg's decision is a blow for 20th Century Fox, which was banking on production starting in the New Year and had reserved several vast soundstages. It also means upheaval for Spielberg's newly independent production company, Dreamworks, which was due to take a 50 per cent stake in the project.
Launching Dreamworks has been trickier than Spielberg thought. It took almost a year to raise the $1.2bn he needed for its proposed slate of 30-odd films following the collapse of AIG, which was due to provide a portion of the funds.
The film's demise also means that Spielberg, who recently finished a new Tintin film, has a hole in his schedule. He has yet to confirm which of the many projects he currently has in development will now move into production.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments