James Bond film was blocked from India shoot amid fears it would show country ‘in poor light’
One of condition was that Daniel Craig would say that the ‘Indian Railways is stronger than James Bond’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Skyfall was originally supposed to film in India until production fell through over a list of conditions put forth by the Indian Railways.
In 2011, officials working on the 23rd James Bond film approached the Indian railway ministry for permission to film a scene atop a moving train.
Former Indian railway minister Dinesh Trivedi told The Hollywood Reporter at the time that producers were told filming could take place dependant on three criteria.
“I put three conditions: that they will not show that passengers in India travel on roofs of trains; that there will be no compromise with safety during the shoot; and that James Bond [played by Daniel Craig] would sign up as a brand ambassador for Indian Railways,” Trivedi said.
“As per the third condition, which was only added in jest, James Bond would be required to say that ‘Indian Railways is stronger than James Bond.’”
He revealed that while the makers of the film were prepared to consent to the second and third requests, they had no desire to shoot in India if they couldn’t show individuals on the roof of a train.
“There will be a scene where James Bond is going to fight on the roof of a train. Otherwise, why would we come to India?” the film officials told Trivedi.
The talks fell through on the grounds that the minister didn’t permit the film crew to show India “in poor light”.
Another market chase sequence was likewise expected to be shot in India. However, director Sam Mendes told The Hollywood Reporter that it was too dangerous to even think about shooting in the narrow streets of Mumbai.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
“It is logistically incredibly difficult to shut down the centre of an enormous Indian city,” he explained. “We tried to make it work and to embrace the chaos, but in the end, there were too many dangers – I don’t mean from people trying to sabotage production, but there are narrow streets that are difficult to film in. I was very disappointed.”
The production crew ended up filming the market and train scenes in Istanbul and Turkey respectively.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments