Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Revamped BFI to take over from UK Film Council

Rob Sharp,Arts Correspondent
Tuesday 30 November 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The British Film Institute (BFI) is to become the new champion for British film, inheriting the funding responsibilities of the UK Film Council and ending a period of uncertainty for the industry.

Ed Vaizey, the minister for culture, said yesterday that a fundamentally changed BFI would have a new board and management structure while it established its new role over the coming months.

"We need a new strategic body to oversee the future of development of film in this country," he said. "On this basis, the BFI will be in charge of delivering the Government's policy for film." Mr Vaizey said it was an opportunity to "unite the British film industry" and added that, from April 2011, the BFI would distribute lottery money to British filmmakers, decide which films would receive tax credits and oversee any strategy to support film in the regions.

The Government axed the Film Council in July, prompting a stream of protests. Tim Bevan, the Council's chairman, condemned the move, saying that "abolishing the most successful film support organisation the UK has ever had is a bad decision, imposed without any consultation or evaluation. British film, one of the UK's more successful growth industries, deserves better."

Greg Dyke, the chairman of the BFI, denied he would have a hands-on role in the expanded organisation. "The moment the chairman tries to get involved in deciding what films should be made he should be shot," he said. "Our aim is to try and increase the annual production budget we use to invest in film from £15m to £18m next year. That's achievable if we reduce our overheads."

Mr Dyke did not confirm where cost-cutting would take place, but added: "We will certainly see a cheaper operation. You don't need two legal departments, for example."

Mr Vaizey said that lottery funding for the film industry was set to increase to £43m annually over the next four years from current subsidies of around £27m a year.

Founded in 1933, the BFI started an Experimental Film Fund in 1952, financing early work by Ridley Scott and Ken Russell. It funded Peter Greenaway's The Draughtsman's Contract in 1982 as well as the work of auteurs such as Derek Jarman and Terence Davies over the next 20 years. The Labour Government closed down its production operations in 1999 when it established the Film Council. "The Film Council was spending 20 per cent of its money on overheads," Mr Dyke said. "We need to be aware of the great competition that there will be for the money we have."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in