Not so elementary: 'Sherlock Holmes' draws mixed reviews
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference."Sherlock Holmes", the latest film incarnation of the quintessentially English detective, drew a mixed reaction from critics here Tuesday who variously described it as a roaring success and a hack job.
London hosted the world premiere late Monday of director Guy Ritchie's movie starring Robert Downey, Junior as Holmes and Jude Law as his sidekick Doctor Watson, though the excitement of the event was not quite matched by the newspaper reviews.
The Times praised the performances of the two main leads, saying Downey was "terrific" and praising Ritchie for drawing "a career-best performance from Law" - but said their double act failed to carry "an overlong film".
The Guardian was more blunt, saying Downey played Holmes "with boggle-eyed hamminess... a cartoon with darting eyes rather than a brain" and Law was just "blank" in this "high-end hack work".
It accused Ritchie of being in a "muddle" over what he was trying to achieve, saying he airbrushed out Holmes' drug use and failed in his attempt to update the lead characters' relationship and that of Watson and his fiancee.
Ritchie insisted he had a clear vision, telling a press conference Monday that he had been a fan of Arthur Conan Doyle's fictional detective since childhood "so I had a really strong vision of who Sherlock Holmes should be".
Many reviewers loved the film, however, including The Sun's showbusiness correspondent who described it as a "roaring success".
Downey was "an exceptional Sherlock, who's a clinical bare-knuckle fighter, hell-raising drinker and charmer", he wrote, adding that Law was surprisingly convincing as a hardman.
The Daily Telegraph described it as "undeniably a rollicking romp, an all-action blockbuster" led by a youthful Holmes that resembles a young Keith Richards, the Rolling Stones guitarist.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
"The pace rarely slackens throughout, the set pieces are explosive, the score relentlessly thunderous. Victorian London is recreated - relying on copious use of computer effects - with an eye for the grimy reality," it said.
The film's producer, Joel Silver, who also worked with Ritchie on his previous movie "RocknRolla", told reporters Monday that Holmes was a "man of action" and they wanted to have fun with the main characters.
"We invested ourselves in trying to make a contemporary movie that feels fresh and original but still embraces what Conan Doyle did. And I hope we succeeded," he said.
The film is released in the United States on December 25.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments