Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kung Fu Panda court case dismissed as claimant charged with fraud for 'tracing drawings' from colouring book

He originally suggested a $12 million settlement, which was rejected by Dreamworks

Jack Shepherd
Tuesday 22 December 2015 17:42 GMT
Comments
(DreamWorks )

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In 2011, Jayme Gordon took out a lawsuit against Dreamworks after claiming he invented the titular character in their animated film series Kung Fu Panda.

The court case has been ongoing ever since, costing the studio $3m (£2m) to defend, but has now been dismissed after Gordon, from Massachusetts, was charged with fraud by prosecutors, according to Reuters.

They allege that he traced his ‘original’ cartoon panda from numerous sources, including a Lion King colouring book published in 1996.

The 51-year-old then backdated the drawings, which he proceeded to use as evidence against Dreamworks.

Authorities have reportedly alleged that Gordon’s idea was to make it look like the film was based on these drawings and that he made up the story, called Panda Power.

They then claimed that Gordon had deleted key evidence from his computer, evidence that would have been necessary to show in court.

He originally suggested a $12 million (£8 million) settlement, which was rejected by Dreamworks.

Gordon has been charged with four counts of fraud and three counts of perjury, the most serious charge could put him in jail for up to 20 years.

"Mr Gordon went to great lengths to orchestrate and maintain this fraudulent scheme, trying to take credit for ideas he did not come up with," said Boston FBI agent Harold Shaw.

"This case demonstrates the FBI's commitment to root out individuals who try to steal ideas and information from hard-working American companies.”

Gordon’s lawyer, Robert Griffin has said his client “maintains his innocence”.

A sequel to Kung Fu Panda was released in 2011, and will be followed by Kung Fu Panda 3 this March in the UK.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in