Joker: Families of Dark Knight shooting victims 'horrified' by Joaquin Phoenix movie
Relatives urge Warner Bros to take a stand for gun reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Family members of those killed while watching a screening of The Dark Knight Rises in 2012 have said they are “horrified” by the forthcoming Joker movie.
An open letter published in Variety accuses the future Batman nemesis, played in the new film by Joaquin Phoenix, as having a “sympathetic origin story”. They also criticised Warner Bros for what they felt was a lack of concern for public safety.
Warner Bros said Joker is not an endorsement of real-life violence.
Twelve people were killed and 70 injured after James Holmes opened fire at a cinema screening of The Dark Knight Rises – the final instalment of Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy starring Christian Bale – in Aurora, Colorado on 20 July 2012.
The letter, which is addressed to Warner Bros, is signed by Sandy and Lonnie Phillips, whose daughter Jessica Ghawi, 24, died in the shooting; Tiina Coon, whose son witnessed the attack; Theresa Hoover, who lost her 18-year-old son AJ Boik; and Heather Dearman, whose cousin Ashley Moser lost her six-year-old daughter Veronica Moser-Sullivan.
Warner Bros said the film is not an endorsement of real-world violence.
“When we learned that Warner Bros was releasing a movie called Joker that presents the character as a protagonist with a sympathetic origin story, it gave us pause,” the letter reads.
“We want to be clear that we support your right to free speech and free expression. But as anyone who has ever seen a comic book movie can tell you: with great power comes great responsibility.
“That’s why we’re calling on you to use your massive platform and influence to join us in our fight to build safer communities with fewer guns.”
The letter adds: “Since the federal government has failed to pass reforms that raise the standard for gun ownership in America, large companies like Warner Brothers have a responsibility to act. We certainly hope that you do.”
Ms Phillips later told BBC News: “When I first saw the trailers of the movie, I was absolutely horrified. And when I dug a little deeper and found out that it had such unnecessary violence in the movie, it just chilled me to my bones.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
“It makes me angry that a major motion picture company isn’t taking responsibility and doesn’t have the concern of the public at all.”
In its response, Warner Bros said it has a “long history of donating to victims of violence”, including the Dark Knight Rises shooting.
“Make no mistake: neither the fictional character Joker, nor the film, is an endorsement of real-world violence of any kind. It is not the intention of the film, the filmmakers or the studio to hold this character up as a hero.”
Joker, which will be released on 4 October to the public, has been met with mixed reactions so far.
The film earned an eight-minute standing ovation during its premiere at the Venice Film Festival. However, Time film critic Stephanie Zacharek (a 2015 Pulitzer Prize finalist) said Phoenix’s character “could easily be adopted as the patron saint of incels“ and said the film was guilty of “aggressive and possibly irresponsible idiocy”.
Variety’s reviewer Owen Gleiberman said the film “does something that flirts with danger – it gives evil a clown-mask makeover, turning it into the sickest possible form of cool”.
Phoenix temporarily left an interview with The Telegraph after being asked whether he was worried that the film might end up inspiring the kind of people it is about, with potentially tragic results.
He later returned and told film critic Robbie Collin that he had been thrown by the question, because the issue hadn’t crossed his mind.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments