Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'It's utter cack': Is Vin Diesel's Fast & Furious 6, er, critically flawless?

Rotten Tomatoes reviews site has given latest instalment a perfect 100 per cent

Simon Usborne
Wednesday 15 May 2013 16:59 BST
Comments
Paul Walker and Vin Diesel in 'Fast & Furious 6'
Paul Walker and Vin Diesel in 'Fast & Furious 6' (Universal Pictures)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Just how good can the sixth episode of a blockbuster series once described as “Rebel Without a Cause without a cause” really be? Bloody brilliant, according to Rotten Tomatoes, the reviews site.

Fast & Furious 6, released on Friday, had a score of 98 per cent (all reviews carried a “fresh” tomato symbol rather than the rotten green one hurled at bad films).

Has Vin Diesel, the film’s star, driven the £1bn (so far) franchise about street racers to new critical heights, or is a conspiracy at play? Neither, sadly – the truth is more boring. Rotten Tomatoes collects reviews and decides whether each is “fresh” or “rotten”. A 100 per cent accumulated score need not reflect five-star reviews. Indeed, many contain negative criticism, as the following experiment in “reverse movie postering” will show.

“The soapier elements of the script drag it down” – Total Film, three stars.

“Objectively terrible” – Empire, three stars.

“Ridiculous” – The Hollywood Reporter.

Not so fresh, and the site doesn’t yet feature the film’s newspaper reviews. Our critic Anthony Quinn has his say on Friday. I email him for a tip. He hasn’t written it yet, but says: “One star is guaranteed – it’s utter cack.” Enjoy those tomatoes while you can, Vin.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in