Gwyneth Paltrow shares blunt response to question about her exes Brad Pitt, Ben Affleck and Chris Martin
‘Shakespeare in Love’ star had high-profile relationships with all three
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Gwyneth Paltrow had a blunt response to a question about her exes Brad Pitt, Ben Affleck and Chris Martin.
The actor and owner of lifestyle company Goop replied to an Instagram post shared by Drew Barrymore.
Earlier this week, The Drew Barrymore Show’s official Instagram account shared a clip in which the host spoke about her past relationships, comparing them to “bird carcasses”.
The post was captioned: “Would you ever get back together with an ex?”
Paltrow, decided to share her answer to the question, hilariously writing: “I’m good.”
The post was picked up by Instagram account @commentsbycelebs.
The actor previously had high-profile relationships with both Pitt and Affleck in the 1990s, as well as a 13-year marriage to Coldplay frontman Martin from 2003 to 2016.
She was engaged to Pitt when she was 24, but their relationship eventually ended due to the intensity of the media’s interest in the couple.
Paltrow went on to date her Shakespeare in Love and Bounce co-star Affleck on-off for three years from 1997 to 2000.
She has two children with Martin, and is now married to producer Brad Falchuk.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments