GLAAD throw support behind campaign to stop IMDb publishing trans actors' birth names
Practice known as 'deadnaming' considered extremely disrespectful
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.GLAAD is supporting a legal push to prevent IMDb from publishing the birth names of transgender actors and other performers, if they don’t want that information to be known.
The organisation announced on Wednesday that it is backing an appeal filed by SAG-AFTRA, the prominent entertainment industry union, fighting the “invasion of privacy” faced by transgender people, along with other advocacy groups.
SAG-AFTRA’s legal challenge dates back to 2017, when a law requiring IMDb to remove performers’ ages upon request – or refrain from listing them – was enacted in California.
The law was struck on First Amendment grounds in 2018.
While the primary concern in 2017 was age discrimination, the focus now includes the publication of people’s birth names.
Using a transgender person’s birth name, as opposed to their chosen name, is known as “deadnaming” and is considered to be extremely disrespectful.
The coalition of groups backing SAG-AFTRA’s legal push allege that IMDb “has been recalcitrant when it comes to the issue of publicising the birth names of transgender individuals in the entertainment industry without their consent” and “do so despite removal requests, complaints, and even lobbying from management and advocacy groups”.
“This is a case about the human rights of all performers,” Gabrielle Carteris, the president of SAG-AFTRA, said.
“I want to thank these groups for signing on and showcasing how damaging the unregulated publication of performers’ personal data can be.
“We want to see this law enforced and are taking every step necessary to achieve that goal.”
The Independent has contacted IMDb for comment.
In April this year, representatives for two anonymous transgender actors told IndieWire that they had been unable to get birth names removed from IMDb despite “extensive lobbying”, per the website.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
IMDb told the platform at the time that it was ”committed to being the most comprehensive source of movie, TV and celebrity information”.
Along with GLAAD, the Transgender Law Center, the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund, Transcend Legal, Inc, and Equality Federation have all thrown their support behind SAG-AFTRA’s appeal.
“Highlighting how IMDb is invading the privacy of transgender performers by publishing their birth names is another facet of this case that we hope will help make it clear to the appellate judges that the harm here is fundamental and compelling, and that the California law is necessary in order to remedy it,” Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, SAG-AFTRA Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel, said.
“The court has so far failed to understand or recognise the massive impact the publication of this personal information can have on the careers and lives of working performers,” Crabtree-Ireland added.