Geoffrey Rush wins record $1.2m in damages for defamation case
The Oscar-winning actor successfully sued Nationwide News, which publishes Australia’s Daily Telegraph, and journalist Jonathon Moran over its reporting of an alleged sexual misconduct case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Geoffrey Rush will receive the largest ever payout for damages made to a single person in Australian history, following his defamation case against a newspaper publisher.
Judge Michael Wigney awarded Rush 2.9m Australian dollars (£1.5m) on 23 May after taking his loss of earnings into consideration, which raised the total from the original sum of 484,000 Australian dollars (£263,000). Mr Rush was originally seeking more than $25m in damages.
The Oscar-winning actor successfully sued Nationwide News, which publishes Australia’s Daily Telegraph, and journalist Jonathon Moran over its reporting of alleged sexual misconduct against actor Eryn Jean Norvill.
Norvill appeared with Mr Rush in a production of Shakespeare's King Lear in 2015 and 2016, where she alleged that he had touched her inappropriately on several occasions and also made lewd comments. Judge Wigney found that Ms Norvill was “prone to exaggeration”.
The BBC reports that Mr Rush's barrister, Sue Chrysanthou, said the Telegraph had shown a “complete lack of impartiality and lack of commercial sense”.
Judge Wigney called the reporting of the allegations, in an article headlined “King Leer”, a recklessly irresponsible piece of sensationalist journalism of... the very worst kind”, according to The Sydney Morning Herald.
He found two reports and a poster by the company to be defamatory towards Rush, who has sought an injunction to prevent the newspaper from re-publishing accusations from the case.
Nationwide News has appealed against an initial ruling in the case.
Tom Blackburn, barrister for the newspaper, said Mr Rush was “trying to shut down any criticism of the judgment” and that the injunction on re-publishing allegations could have a detrimental effect on coverage of the #MeToo movement.