Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Four Weddings and 72 auditions: Hugh Grant won romcom role after marathon casting process

 

Matilda Battersby
Tuesday 27 August 2013 08:47 BST
Comments
Hugh Grant was the 72nd person to be auditioned for the lead role in Four Weddings and a Funeral
Hugh Grant was the 72nd person to be auditioned for the lead role in Four Weddings and a Funeral (Rex Features)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

With his cut-glass English charm and endearingly chaotic manner (not to mention the floppy hair) Hugh Grant has proven himself every bit the leading man. But the actor was actually the 72nd person to be auditioned for Four Weddings and a Funeral, and the was the first to make it seem funny, Richard Curtis has revealed.

The role of Charles, a character comically stuck between his clinging his girlfriend "Duckface" and his hopeless feelings for the unavailable American Carrie (Andie MacDowell), catapulted Grant to stardom nearly 20 years ago.

The actor, who is now a staunch press privacy campaigner, he went on to play the affable hero in major subsequent romcoms including Notting Hill, Bridget Jones’s Diary and Love, Actually.

Curtis, who wrote Four Weddings, directed by Mike Newell, told the Radio Times: “Hugh Grant was, I think, the 72nd person we auditioned for the lead in Four Weddings, and was the first one to make it seem funny at all.”

The screenwriter, whose latest (and ostensibly final) directorial effort About Time, opened last week, said that Four Weddings had to be re-edited before it was released because it initially “didn’t work at all”.

Four Weddings was a surprise hit, becoming the highest-grossing British film in cinema history in its day, earning more than $245 million at the global box office and an Oscar nomination.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in