Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Trump doesn't understand what Citizen Kane is about

'There was a great rise in Citizen Kane, and there was a modest fall,' Trump says of the film. 

Clarisse Loughrey
Friday 18 November 2016 11:40 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Trump doesn't understand what his favourite film is even about.

He's stated in the past that Orson Welles' iconic Citizen Kane is his most treasured film of all time; telling Bloomberg that he loves the director, though he was "totally f*cked up. He was a total mess. But think of his wives. Think of his hits." Ah yes, forget that he was one of the most ambitious, influential, and inspired creative voices of his time - what's most important here is having Rita Hayworth hanging off your arm.

Of course, that opinion will be of no surprise to anyone; yet, Vulture has now unearthed a video of Trump elaborating a little on his love of Citizen Kane and managing to completely misinterpret what the film was about in the process.

Trump delivers his own version of one of those intolerable YouTube video essays - so brilliantly spoofed here; stating the kind of painfully obvious visual clue that Kane's wealth creates both a physical and emotional distance with his wife, as seen in their increasingly lengthening dining room table.

And who's fault is that? Is it Kane's, a narcisstic meglomaniac who treats women like pawns in his power games? Don't be silly - it's his wife's, of course! "The relationship he had was not a good one for him," Trump declares. "And probably not a great one for her. Although, there were benefits for her. But in the end, she was certainly not a happy camper."

Which seems to be his entire takeaway from the film; when asked if he had one piece of advice for Charles Foster Kane, he replies, "Get yourself a different woman."


Indeed, it doesn't seem as if Trump absorbed any of Welles' critique of power structures, or even the basic plot of the film. "There was a great rise in Citizen Kane, and there was a modest fall," Trump says of the film. "The fall wasn’t a financial fall. The fall was a personal fall, but it was a fall nevertheless."

Ah yes. Losing everything you ever loved in life is a "modest fall", now. Just like the Death Star getting blown up was a "minor setback" for the Empire, right?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in