Wes Anderson says Netflix was ‘perfect’ place to release forthcoming short as it’s ‘not a real movie’
‘Do you think Wes knows how much he just insulted Netflix?’ one person asked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wes Anderson has “ruthlessly” criticised Netflix – seemingly without meaning to.
The director, whose new film Asteroid City is released later this month, has directed a Roald Dahl adaptation for the streaming service, which is set to be released later this year.
Anderson’s The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar, based on the author’s short story collection from 1977, stars Ralph Fiennes, Benedict Cumberbatch and Ben Kingsley.
The director, who previously directed the animated adaptation of Dahl’s Fantastic Mr Fox (2009), revealed in a new interview that The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar will be just 37 minutes long.
He told IndieWire that he had wanted to adapt the short story collection for 20 years, but “by the time I was ready to do it”, the rights to Dahl’s works had been sold to Netflix.
“Suddenly, in essence, there was nowhere else you could do it since they own it,” Anderson said, suggesting he only worked with Netflix on the project because he had to.
He then added: “But beyond it, because it’s a 37-minute movie, [Netflix] was the perfect place to do it because it’s not really a movie.”
Anderson acknowledged that he “had only a good experience with Netflix”, but said: “I’m very happy to be putting Asteroid City in cinemas. Focus and Universal are doing it the real cinema way. That’s the way I really want my movies to be shown.”
Following his remarks, many are commenting on the way Anderson subtly criticised the streaming service.
Andrew Woods wrote: “That's wonderful shade at Netflix,” while David Renshaw tweeted: “Write this on Netflix’s grave.” Twitter user @duckisgod stated: “Do you think Wes knows how much he just insulted Netflix?”
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
However, some said that “it rocks” that Anderson is championing short-form moviemaking.
“Everyone’s into the *epic burn* on Netflix here but it rocks that he realized short form is what best supported his take and it’s good that Netflix can be a venue for that kind of project,”@tjbnx wrote, adding: “Lord knows theatrical or television has little-to-no room for one-off projects like this.”
Asteroid City, released on 23 June, is one of The Independent’s five best films to watch this month. Find the full review here.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments