Absolutely fuming: Woody Allen refuses to release Blue Jasmine in India after censors wanted smoking ads inserted
The director didn't want his film ruined by anti-smoking adverts
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Louise Thomas
Editor
Woody Allen's acclaimed film Blue Jasmine was not released as planned in India this weekend after the director refused to bow to censorship laws over smoking.
In India, films and television shows in which a character smokes a cigarette must carry anti-tobacco ads before the movie begins. In addition, whenever a character smokes, there must be a health warning on the screen.
Smoking is by no means an integral part of Blue Jasmine, which stars Cate Blanchett and Alec Baldwin, but Allen didn't want the mandatory changes to corrupt his artistic vision.
A source told Reuters India: "Allen was adamant that he wanted the film to be shown as he had made it, without any additions to the print."
The director's spokesperson added: "Due to content in the film, it cannot be shown in India in its intended manner. Therefore, the film is not scheduled to play there."
The film's Indian distributor, PVR Pictures, said Allen "wasn't comfortable" with the no-smoking disclaimer, believing that "when the scroll comes, attention goes to it rather than the scene."
Allen won't be too disappointed by the lost box office that the Indian non-release will cost him. Blue Jasmine has done stellar business for a small arthouse movie, having grossed almost $50m (£31m) worldwide.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments