Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rian Johnson trolls Twitter over how much Benedict Cumberbatch got paid for 1917 cameo

Many Twitter followers fell for the Knives Out director's trick

Jacob Stolworthy
Monday 20 January 2020 13:23 GMT
Comments
1917 - Official Trailer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rian Johnson has tricked many Twitter users into thinking Benedict Cumberbatch got paid an eye-watering salary for his small appearance in 1917.

The British actor appears towards the end of Sam Mendes’ First World War drama, but Johnson told his followers that, due to the director’s decision to shoot the film in one continuous take, he had to wait for six months – in character – to perform his scene.

He posted the tweets after a conversation he claimed to have had with Mendes at the Producers Guild of America Awards (PGAs) on Saturday (18 January). He joked to his followers that, because Cumberbatch had to wait for so long to perform his two-minute scene, he was paid $23m.

“Last night at the PGA awards, Mendes told me 1917 was ACTUALLY shot in one continuous take – if an actor flubbed a line they’d go all the way back and start again from the beginning,” Johnson said. “They paid Cumberbatch to show up every day and wait in that room at the end. He was there six months. They paid him $23m.”

Johnson told his followers that Mendes said the Sherlock actor would wait in character for a production walkie to keep him updated on the progress of the film. “A few times a day the walkie would squawk ‘going again’,”Johnson joked.

Many Twitter users took the bait.

“Hold up, you can get paid $23m just for sitting in a room all day?” one person tweeted, while another added: “For real, though. $23m for sitting in a trailer for six months. I understand how the economics goes, but that’s incredibly galling for a lot of people to hear.”

But others swiftly pointed out that Johnson was playing a big old prank on his followers.

“He has the Time Stone, he can just pop in when needed,” one tweeter wrote in reference to Cumberbatch’s Marvel character, Doctor Strange.

Another quipped: “Rumour has it that Cumberbatch still waits in that room. If you listen closely, you might still hear him practising his lines.”

1917 was a surprise winner of the Best Film – Drama trophy at the Golden Globes earlier this month. It’s considered a frontrunner to win Best Picture at the 2020 Oscars alongside South Korean film Parasite and Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

The ceremony takes place on 9 February.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in