Good Scene / Bad Scene: Chosen by Tim McCanlies, the director of 'Secondhand Lions'

Friday 31 October 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Good: To Kill A Mockingbird Robert Mulligan, 1962

Atticus Finch (Gregory Peck) is defending a black man accused of rape in a small, Southern town. He has obviously proved the man innocent, but he's still found guilty. Atticus turns to walk out, and all the local black people who have been segregated in the gallery get up and stand. Atticus's children are in the gallery also, and they are told: "Stand, your father's walking by." It's a very quiet, dignified scene, without big histrionics or dialogue. It's all visual. Up to this point, everything has been seen through the eyes of his children, and here we see Atticus through other people's eyes for the first time.

Bad: Lawrence of Arabia David Lean, 1962

There's one scene that muddles the whole film. A Turk has captured Lawrence (Peter O'Toole) and he's tortured in a sexual way - we think. Perhaps because of the mores of that time, it's not clear what's happening: is Lawrence playing the victim or affirming his sexual identity? The rest of the film is about adventure, and I think that the whole movie suffers in its latter part because of this change in direction. I didn't understand why it was so important when there were other, more interesting issues to deal with - like how everything fell apart for the Arabs at the end of the war.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in