Culture: It's as if Shatner never existed...

Toby Young
Sunday 10 May 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The summer blockbuster season officially kicked off on Friday with the worldwide release of Star Trek. Uncharitable souls are calling it Star Trek XI, underlining just how dependent the Hollywood studios are on sequels to herd people into the multiplexes. Strictly speaking, though, it isn't a sequel – it's an attempt to "reboot" the franchise by pretending the previous 10 Star Trek films haven't been made.

The reboot formula was patented by Christopher Nolan with Batman Begins (2005). As with Star Trek, the marketing for that film emphasised that it would be an exploration of the central character's origins – his psychological back story. This proved successful enough to spawn a genuine sequel, The Dark Knight (2008), which became the biggest blockbuster of last year. Superman Returns (2006), which ignored this formula in favour of a straight retread, was less successful. At this stage, a sequel looks unlikely.

The precise definition of a reboot is elusive. Clearly, having a new, younger actor play the central character is essential, but if that were the only criterion, then On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969) would have been a reboot when, in fact, it was just another film in the continuing series. On the other hand, Casino Royale (2006) is generally regarded as a reboot of the Bond franchise – though, confusingly, it was also a remake. As with Batman Begins, the key point is that it explored the character's origins.

What of Terminator Salvation, another of this summer's blockbusters? Is that a reboot of the Terminator franchise? The answer is no – it is a sequel. Confusingly, though, it is a sequel to Terminator 2, not Terminator 3, which the film-makers are pretending never happened. In that regard, it is more like one of those sequels that comes around after a very long gap – like Live Free or Die Hard (2007), the fourth in the Bruce Willis-fronted series, which appeared 12 years after the third, Die Hard: With a Vengeance (1995).

So far, reboots have largely proved successful, with one glaring exception. After the first Hulk (2003) failed to pull in the crowds, an attempt was made to relaunch the franchise with The Incredible Hulk (2008). That, too, proved a box-office disappointment. Apparently, there are some comic-book characters audiences just aren't interested in, no matter how fascinating their origins.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in