Fashion: Dress sense

Tamsin Blanchard
Sunday 02 August 1998 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ANIMAL fur has become one of the great fashion dinner-conversation no-nos. The issue is as "over" as last season's Gucci shoes. If women want to wear it, what's your problem? It's just another luxury fabric like leather or cashmere. Anyway, it's all either farmed or a by-product.

A week or so ago, I returned from five days at the haute couture shows in Paris, where the collections started with mink shoes and seal skirts at Versace and ended with full-blown fox furs and minks at Yves Saint Laurent. Fur is having quite a fashion moment - and nobody is batting an eyelid. The more fashion designers use it, the more acceptable it seems to become. As I watched coats with fox tails being dragged along the catwalks at the houses of designers both young and old, I looked around me for looks of discomfort on the faces in the audience. But no, there was not even the slightest flicker of disgust, just the whirring of cameras and a smattering of appreciative applause.

"Chinchillas are farmed like rabbits," I was assured by the president of the French Fur Federation after the Givenchy show. Oh, so that's all right then. They are farmed for a reason; let's hit them all on the head and sew their skins into collars and cuffs. "Increasingly, designers are looking for more uncommon furs," he added. "Wild animals." Of course they are. In fashion, extremes and excesses are the order of the day. That's fine if it involves an extra two shoulder pads or a hemline so short a skirt becomes a belt. But when supposedly civilised people are condoning the farming of animals and the culling of seals because their skins make ugly women look even uglier, excess becomes atrocity. Yet nobody will talk about it any more. Nobody splatters red paint on fashion designers' heads. And nobody will confront a fur wearer about her habit - because to be anti-fur is so last season, darling.

Thank God for Brigitte Bardot. Just as I was beginning to despair that the human race would implode with apathy, her leaflets began to be circulated outside the shows. "Do you prefer your furs trapped or farmed?" they asked. "It's for you to decide if wildlife should be respected or not." Whether or not you take a moral stand on wearing fur, there is no getting away from the fact that the woman who can afford to buy it is not likely to spend more than three minutes at a time away from the comfort of her central heating or her limousine. Nan Kempner, the New York socialite, stopped herself in the middle of enthusing about the "beautiful black broadtail fur" she had her eye on at Dior. "What a waste, though," she said. "Who would see it? The husband, the chauffeur and the coat-check attendant." !

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in