Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.This week the PCA/Intel Grand Prix moves to London for the latest in its rapid-play series. This time, the computer, Mephisto Genius 2, will be competing alongside the world's best. We asked it to assess one of its main rivals.
White: G Kasparov
Black: A Shirov
Novgorod 1994
Comments based on analysis by Genius 2.
1. c4
I suppose he feels he can get away with stuff like this against humans, but I can't help noticing that Kasparov always played 1. e3 against my colleague Fritz 2 in Munich a couple of months ago.
1 . . . e5 2. Nc3 Bb4 3. Nd5 Be7
My book prefers 3 . . . Ba5 4. b4 c6.
4. d4 d6 5. e4 c6
5 . . . exd4 6. Qxd4 Nf6 followed by Nc6 looks more straightforward to me.
6. Nxe7 Qxe7 7. Ne2 f5
This looks fishy. 7 . . . Nf6 8. Nc3 0-0 must be the right way to play.
8. dxe5 Qxe5 9. exf5 Nf6 10. Qd4]
Good move. I saw this too. Now it's not so easy for Black to get his pawn back.
10 . . . Bxf5 11. Bf4 Qa5+
11 . . . Qxd4 12. Nxd4 leaves both bishop and d-pawn attacked.
12. Qc3
Timid. I'd have brazened it
out with 12. Nc3 0-0 13. Bxd6 Re8+ 14. Be2.
12 . . . Qxc3+ 13. Nxc3 0-0 14. 0- 0-0 d5 15. Bd6
15. cxd5 cxd5 16. Nxd5 Rc8+ is troublesome, so I'd have
played 14. Rd1 instead of 0-0-0.
15 . . . Rc8 16. f3 Nbd7 17. g4 Be6 18. g5 Ne8 19. cxd5 Bxd5 20. Bg3
I must say I didn't guess any of White's last four moves. He must be planning 20 . . . Bxf3 21. Bc4+ Kh8 22. Rxd7 Bxh1 23. Rf7]
20 . . . Be6 21. Bd3 Nc5 22. Bc2 Rd8 23. h4 Bf7 24. Ne4 Nxe4 25. fxe4 Kf8?
White has a clear advantage after this. 25 . . . c5 is better.
26. Rdf1 Kg8 27. h5] Rd7 28. Rf2 Nd6 29. g6] (see diagram)
Just as I missed his plan of g4 and g5, I didn't see h4 and h5 either. He certainly seems good at pushing his pawns. Now 29 . . . hxg6 30. hxg6 Bxg6 loses to Bxd6 and Bb3+.
29 . . . Be6 30. gxh7+ Kh8 31. h6 g6 32. Rf6 Re8 33. Rxg6
I prefer 33. Be5 Kxh7 34. Bxd6, when Rxd6 is murdered by 35. e5.
33 . . . Nc4 34. Be1 Kxh7 35. Rg3 Ne5 36. Bc3 Bc4 37. Rg7+] resigns.
After 37 . . . Rxg7 38. hxg7+ Kxg7 39. Rh5 Kf6 40. Rf5+ White wins a piece. There's no doubt this Kasparov plays well, but I'm told I'll be operating on a faster processor in London.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments