Cries & Whispers

Jack Hughes
Saturday 09 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE EDITOR of The Late Show, Michael Poole, has launched a tirade at television critics. Writing in Media Guardian, Poole accuses the breed of being amateurs, generalists, who see their columns 'as occasions for clever-dickery'. He lists a few exceptions, such as our own Allison Pearson, without a word as to why they are exceptional, and concludes (surprise) that the exceptions prove the rule. The rule being that 'TV criticism is really for people who don't like television'. Above all, he complains that telly, in its 'troubled state', lacks 'a critical support system' of the kind that the worlds of books, theatre and art 'take for granted'.

He makes many other points, and some are fair. But his main thrust is quite wrong. Critics are not support systems. They don't exist to prop up the art-forms they cover: they exist to inform and amuse their readers. If they also help art-forms to flourish, that's great. But it's a bonus.

It is not surprising that someone in television an inward-looking world, in my experience should fail to see this. What is surprising is that it should be Michael Poole. One of his changes at The Late Show has been to turn Thursday's edition into Late Review an arts page of the air. This is a fine opportunity to unearth some new talent, some fresh voices. So who has Poole hired? As presenter, Mark Lawson, who made his name as TV critic of the Independent. Among the panellists, the aforementioned Allison Pearson. Also Tony Parsons, of the Telegraph, who is not a TV critic, but could well be: he's jokey, forthright, resolutely non-specialist. The same goes for Tom Paulin, without the jokes. The other regular critic is Joanna Coles, the Guardian columnist, who also presents Medium wave on Radio 4. All these print people add up to an entertaining panel. But their presence makes it a little hard to take Poole's strictures seriously.

TO THE theatre, for A Month in the Country. The screen shunts aside to reveal chairs, a chaise-longueodwe, and people in old costumes sitting playing cards. Tasteful set, stars (John Hurt, Helen Mirren) and a classic play (by Turgenev): yes, it's another of those stately revivals that are killing the West End.

The giveaway is the seating. Hughes's Law of Theatre states that the more chairs you see on stage, the more boring the play will be. The most fatal line an actor can deliver is 'Sit down, we need to talk'. No, no, you think: stay up, you need to do something. Drama means action. The play lasts three hours Several Months in the Country, if you ask me. I left at half-time. The show got rave reviews.

Next night (ever the optimist) I saw Johnny on a Spot at the National. There are 101 reasons may be a worse play than the Turgenev, but jokes, brio and a sense that there is an audience out there are not among them. A wisecracking satire on American politics, by the man who co-wrote The Front Page, this is a show with loads of energy. No one has time to sit down and say how they feel. Which, let's face it, we can usually guess anyway. The show was panned.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in