Pierre-Laurent Aimard, Queen Elizabeth Hall, London, review: An extraordinary performance of Ligeti's Etudes
The pianist never misses a beat over a cycle of 18 etudes that stretch the human limits of playing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.György Ligeti’s piano études stretched the limits of what it was thought technically possible for a human – as opposed to a machine – to play. Yet the spur for their creation was his own inadequate piano technique.
He drew a parallel with Cezanne’s trouble with perspective: the apples and pears in the painter’s still-lifes seemed perpetually on the point of rolling away, and his table-cloths had the rigidly of plaster models. “But what wonders Cezanne accomplished with his harmonies of colour,” Ligeti wrote, “with his emotionally-charged geometry, with his curves, volumes, and weight-displacements! That’s what I would like to achieve: the transformation of inadequacy into professionalism.”
Pierre-Laurent Aimard is one of the very few pianists who can satisfactorily deliver these works – indeed, some of them were composed with him in mind – so to hear him play 18 of them live was a rare bonus.
Ligeti asserted that these compositions were neither tonal nor atonal, neither avant-garde nor traditional, and in no way postmodern. They proceeded from a very simple core idea, and led from simplicity to great complexity: “They behave like growing organisms,” he said.
I once asked Aimard how he approached these dense clouds of notes. “You have to use controls quite different from the traditional ones you use for the voices of a Bach fugue,” he replied. Were those controls in the brain, or the fingers? “They are both in the brain and in the physical contact. You have to find a synthesis.” But when he played, did he watch the score, or his fingers? “It depends on the étude – with some pieces I keep a very careful eye on the score.”
All of which made the sudden slide into a heap of the loose pages his assistant was turning for him at the QEH – negotiated without missing a beat – all the more remarkable. This was an extraordinary – and extraordinarily fast – performance.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments