The Marriage of Figaro, Coliseum, London, review: An unusually strong cast makes up for muddy staging
This revival of Fiona Shaw’s production is still cluttered – but the chorus, cast and conducting prove saving graces
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Fiona Shaw’s production of The Marriage of Figaro didn’t fire on all cylinders when it premiered, and after its second revival there are still problems, some of which could be easily solved.
The bluebottle imprisoned in the harpsichord was always – to change the metaphor – a red herring, and would be one unnecessary distraction well lost (is it supposed to symbolise Cherubino?).
There are more irrelevant distractions in the first act, plus much insistently laboured symbolism vaguely suggesting cuckoldry to no significant effect. The cluttered and endlessly rotating set, revealing endlessly busy tableaux, makes for a muddy start to the drama; the scene in which Susanna has to hide three people from each other demands much smarter direction than it gets here, and is consequently not nearly funny enough. One of the basic rules of comedy is that less is more, but the more Shaw piles on the sight-gags, the less comic it all becomes.
This production’s saving graces are the refined energy of Martin Brabbins’s conducting, the convincingly 18th-century world conjured up by the chorus, Jeremy Sams’s adroitly rhymed translation, and an unusually strong cast.
On Ashley Riches the role of Count Almaviva fits like a glove – he’s haughty, sulky, spoilt, predatorily lubricious, and his sound is darkly seductive. Thomas Oliemans makes a wary and rather bitter Figaro, the virile edge to his voice making a fine foil to Rhian Lois’s delicately sung and mischievously acted Susanna. Katie Coventry’s Cherubino is a delight: she conveys the tremulous desires of adolescent masculinity with total conviction, and sings with nuanced grace.
Meanwhile Janis Kelly, Keel Watson, and Colin Judson respectively turn Marcellina, Doctor Bartolo, and Don Basilio into such vivid caricatures that in their scenes the comedy keeps fizzing. And when Lucy Crowe announces her presence as the Countess with that great lament for lost love, “Porgi amor”, it’s as though we have been struck by lightning: her sound has such warmth, fullness, and power that it suffuses the whole auditorium with a golden glow.
Shaw’s directorial take on this work is justifiably feminist: her production brings out the wisdom and cunning of the women at the expense of the men, and the final fleeting image is of Crowe with a suitcase, dressed for a lone journey: well, why not?
Until 14 April (eno.org)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments