Ivo Pogorelich, Royal Festival Hall, review: A strange comeback at the Southbank

His Schumann didn't sound like Schumann at all, but by the end he had the ecstatic audience – and this critic – in the capacious palm of his hand

Michael Church
Wednesday 25 February 2015 13:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the Eighties Ivo Pogorelich was the hottest pianist on the planet, combining haute couture with a fabulous technique and very individual artistry.

But then disaster struck: his mentor-wife died and the voices in his head told him to play slower and slower, until he finally fell silent. He returned to the Southbank four years ago to play a Tchaikovsky concerto, but this week’s recital in a packed Festival Hall was his real comeback after fifteen years away.

Now statuesque and dusty-looking rather than lithe and glossy, he launched into Liszt’s Apres une lecture du Dante as though he and it were inhabiting a marble tomb: its cold authority was unrelieved, but it built a formidable momentum with the central section singing powerfully.

Schumann’s Opus 17 Fantasie which followed didn’t sound like Schumann at all: its opening was flaccid, it drifted where it should have been driven by passion; it suggested something trapped under a microscope rather than flying free, with time passing in painful slow motion.

For poetry we had to wait until the middle movement of Stravinsky’s Petrushka, but then something clicked, and he played Brahms’s Herculean Paganini Variations as though possessed: his interpretations were idiosyncratic but wonderfully persuasive, and by the end he had the ecstatic audience – and this critic – in the capacious palm of his hand.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in