Cédric Tiberghien, Wigmore Hall, review: This programme to mark Armistice Day was arresting and significant

Tiberghien’s light and sensitive touch was most brilliantly in evidence in Debussy’s ‘Etudes’, each emerging fresh and original

Michael Church
Monday 12 November 2018 12:05 GMT
Comments
Cédric Tiberghien has a light and sensitive touch
Cédric Tiberghien has a light and sensitive touch (Benjamin Ealovega)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Invited by the Wigmore Hall to devise a programme to mark the First World War armistice, Cédric Tiberghien created something both arresting and significant. Choosing works composed in each year of the conflict, he built up a picture of piano music at this pivotal moment in its development, and also indicated something of the war’s human consequences.

There was no way he could have included Ravel’s Concerto for the Left Hand – written for the Austrian pianist Paul Wittgenstein who lost his right arm in the conflict – but he found something else reflecting exactly the same situation. In 1918 the English composer Frank Bridge wrote his Three Improvisations for the Left Hand for the pianist Douglas Fox who had also lost his right arm. The improvisations were elegantly turned miniatures which spoke eloquently for England.

Debussy, suffering from the cancer that would kill him, found himself pushed by circumstances towards a new aesthetic in his Etudes Book II, and he told his publisher, “I want to work – not so much for myself as to provide a proof, however small, that 30 million Boches can’t destroy French thought.” Meanwhile the response of Paul Hindemith, who survived grenade attacks while on sentry duty, was more oblique: In einer Nacht… Träume und Erlebnisse – “In one night... dreams and experiences” – is a rarely performed work which Tiberghien regards as a masterpiece.

I wouldn’t go that far, but it has singular power, particularly when played as this brilliant French pianist did, as did two other rarities, Karol Szymanowski’s 12 Etudes Opus 33, and Scriabin’s late work Vers la flamme: Poème Opus 72. Tiberghien’s light and sensitive touch was most brilliantly in evidence in Debussy’s Etudes, each emerging fresh and original, which were the guiding thread through the programme. His encore – Gershwin’s Rialto Ripples – was a suitable reminder of America’s late entry into the war, and set the seal on a coruscating evening.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in