Chess: Identity crisis in Philadelphia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JOHN VON NEUMANN (1903- 1957), mathematician and computer pioneer, is apparently alive and well and playing in tournaments in the United States, writes William Hartston.
Someone of that name entered the World Open in Philadelphia last month. He wore headphones at the board, was frequently observed fumbling beneath his jacket, and was as erratic in his play as in his behaviour.
In the second round, he drew with the Icelandic grandmaster Helgi Olafsson. A spectator who asked von Neumann what had been the opening of the game was surprised by the answer: 'Sicilian Defence or Ruy Lopez.' Sometimes he thought for 20 minutes or more over forced moves.
In the fourth round, playing White, he began 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. e5? Nge7, then settled down for a very long think before playing 5. Be2.
Curious behaviour must be commonplace in Philadelphia, for it took until the ninth round before anyone complained to the tournament director, but the headphones, the fumbling, the erratic play and his name led them to suspect computer involvement.
After all, that 4. e5 move in the fourth round would have been perfectly normal if Black had played 2 . . . Nf6 instead of 2 . . . Nc6. And if the position had to be reset for a machine to adjust to a transmission error, it would explain the long delay on the following move.
The assistant director of the tournament asked to see proof of von Neumann's identity, which he could not produce. When asked to speak to the director, von Neumann declined on the grounds that his wife was having a baby.
When von Neumann's final score qualified him for a prize as one of the best unrated players, he was asked to solve a simple chess problem to demonstrate that he could indeed play the game. When he refused to do so, he was denied his prize for alleged cheating. Such ingenuity and enterprise deserved more. Let us hope he disguises it better next time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments