Chess

Matthew Sadler
Sunday 06 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain's youngest grandmaster explains how he let a woman slip from his grasp.

White: Matthew Sadler

Black: Ketevan Arakhamia

Hastings 1993-4

King's Indian Defence

1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. f3 0-0 6. Bg5 c5 7. d5 e6 8. Qd2 exd5 9. cxd5

I have played this unbalanced position many times as White. I am happy with my strong centre and a Black weakness to attack on d6, but Black has a big advantage in development and plenty of plans to choose from.

9 . . . b6 10. a4 Na6 11. Nh3

A neat trick, planning to meet 11 . . . Bxh3 with 12. Bxa6 completing my K-side development. One of the problems of this variation is finding a useful role for the knight on g1 where it does not obstruct the bishop.

11 . . . Nb4 12. Nf2 h6 13. Be3 h5 14. Bb5 Ba6 15. 0-0 Bxb5 16. axb5 a6

I thought for a long time here. I felt I stood better but I could see no way to prevent Black exchanging pieces and untangling her Q-side. Eventually I found an idea.

17. bxa6 Nxa6 18. Ra3 Nc7 19. Rfa1 Rxa3 20. Rxa3 b5 21. e5]

A typical breakthrough in such positions, and just in time to deal with the threat posed by the advancing Q-side pawns. I think Black's best now is to exchange pieces by 21 . . . b4 22. exf6 Bxf6 23. Ra2 bxc3 24. bxc3 though White has a nice advantage thanks to the weak pawn on d6. After Black's reply, which she played instantly, I felt very confident.

21 . . . dxe5 22. Bxc5 Re8 23. d6 Ne6 24. Bb4 Nd4

25. Nfe4 Nxe4 26. Nxe4 f5

27. Nc3

I couldn't quite decide between this and the more adventurous 27. Ng5. In the end I decided to play solidly and control the centre.

27 . . . e4 28. fxe4 fxe4 29. Nd5 Rf8 30. Bc5?? (see diagram)

I was quite happy with this move, chasing away the powerful black knight, which made my embarrassment on seeing her reply all the greater. It's Black to play and win:

30 . . . Qg5]]

The queen is immune from capture because of 31. Qxg5 Ne2+ 32. Kh1 Rxf1 mate, while 31. Ne3, quite apart from losing the bishop, allows 31 . . . Nf3+ forking king and queen. With my queen and knight attacked, and Nf3 in the air, I am totally lost.

31. Nf6+ Qxf6 White resigns.

My 30th move was really unfortunate: it placed an extra piece on the fifth rank and left my queen unprotected, helping the combination to work in all variations. Instead, 30. Ne7+, or practically any other move, would have kept a big advantage. Chess can be a cruel game.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in