Chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A leading aspirant for the International Master title gives his thoughts on men and machines.
I despise chess computers, mainly because their style of play is perfect against my own. I rely heavily on intuition. A computer, by contrast, has no 'gut feeling' but relies on concrete analysis. At present, against suitable hardware, my own gut feeling is not enough.
The following game is not a guide on how to beat your chess computer but merely a triumph of soul over silicon.
White: Chess Genius 2
Black: A Mortazavi
London 1994
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Bd3 Nf6 6. 0-0 Qc7 7. Nc3 b5 8. Bg5 Be7 9. Qe2 d6 10. a4 b4 11. Nb1?
I was more worried by 11. Na2.
11 . . . Bb7 12. Nd2 Nbd7 13. Rfe1 0-0 14. a5 Rfc8 15. N2f3 Bf8 16. Qd2 e5 17. Nb3 Re8
In the style of the great strategist Aaron Nimzowitsch, I have over-protected e5 in preparation for the liberating d5 pawn break. A curious thought entered my mind: it hasn't even heard of Nimzowitsch]
18. Nh4 d5 19. exd5 Bxd5 20. Nf5 Qb7]
I need to induce some weaknesses. Now White must make an unhappy pawn move.
21. f3 Rad8?
Stupid, the rook is needed on a8 to defend the a-pawn.
22. Qe2 h6?]
Call it what you like, human ego, pride, I just couldn't face playing the rook back to a8.
23. Bxa6 Qc7 24. Bxf6?]
The first whiff of compensation. Most humans would have preferred 24. Be3, meeting e4 with f4.
24 . . . Nxf6 25. Bb5 Re6 26. Rec1?]
Giving me just the half-move I need to get my attack rolling.
26 . . . e4] 27. Nfd4 Re5 28. c4 Ba8
I had seen 28 . . . exf3 29. Qf2 Ng4 30. Qh4 f2+ 31. Kh1 and decided to keep up pressure with Ba8. I forgot computers are immune to psychological pressure.
29. f4 Rh5 30. Qd2 g5] 31. g3 Bd6 32. c5 Bxf4]]
When I played this move, the software's assessment of its position shot to levels indicating a winning advantage. My intuition, however, told me that White is losing.
33. gxf4 gxf4 34. a6 Bd5?]
After 34 . . . e3 35. Qxb4 Rxh2?] 36. Kxh2 f3+ 37. Kh3] I saw no good continuation, so reverted to intuition and saved my bishop from being cut off with c6.
35. Qxb4 f3 36. Rc2 Rg5+ 37. Kf1 Ng4 38. Ke1 e3 (see diagram)
Even a computer can see that Black has enough for the piece.
39. Bf1 Nxh2 40. Nd2 Qg3+ 41. Kd1 exd2 42. Rxd2 Nxf1 43. Rd3 Re5 44. Raa3 Qg1 45. Kc2 Ne3+ 46. Rxe3 Rxe3 47. Rxe3 Qxe3 48. Qc3 and White gave up.
Every genius must pay a price. It should have read Nimzowitsch.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments