Chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TODAY, THE first of an occasional series of favourite studies: studies, that is, not problems, though I shall also be running those from time to time. The difference is that, in a study, one has a normal chess task - winning or drawing - whereas, in a problem, it will be mate in a fixed number of moves, or, perhaps, something somewhat more esoteric such as the very enjoyable helpmate genre in which both sides have to co-operate to checkmate the black king.
Generally, I prefer fairly natural studies in positions that look as though they might have arisen in a game. Today's is an exception. Composed by the Russian Leopold Mitrofanov, I could have consulted any of a number of sources to refresh my memory but in fact used Endgame Magic, by John Beasley and Timothy Whitworth (BT Batsford, pounds 9.99).
When solving a study like this, it's essential to do so in sympathy with the composer. Unfortunately, the strain put on the board by tactical sequences such as what follows often leads to errors; indeed this is a correction of a previously unsound setting. However, the manic moves - line clearances and obstructions, apparently absurd sacrifices - come straight from (to mix my analysts) the "collective chess id" and should be picked out almost "subconsciously" from it.
Obviously White starts with 1 b6+ when the Black king must retreat 1...Ka8 to retain the defence ...Bb8. If now 2 g7? h1Q 3 g8Q+ Bb8 4 a7 Qa1+. So we get the first "surprise" 2 Re1! to force a blockage on the first rank. The next few moves are natural: 2 Re1! Nxe1 3 g7 h1Q 4 g8Q+ Bb8 5 a7.
Happily the mundane 5...Nd7 is refuted by 6 Qe6 forcing a quick and cheerful mate in all lines eg: 6...Nxb6 7 Qc6+ Kxa7 8 Qxb6+ Ka8 9 Qc6+ Ka7 10 Qa6 mate. Instead, Black must play the much more aesthetic 5...Nc6+ 6 dxc6 Qxh5+.
And now the effect which the composer spent perhaps hundreds of hours to achieve. If 7 Ka6 Qe2+ and so...7 Qg5!! deflecting the white queen 7...Qxg5+ 8 Ka6. With the queen on g5, there is no check and so: 8...Bxa7 9 c7 Qa5+ 10 Kxa5 Bxb6+ 11 Kxb6 and wins - but, without the knight stranded on e1, this would be stalemate. A masterpiece!
jspeelman@compuserve.com
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments