Chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETERBURG KINGS completed victory in their monumental battle with Beersheva on Tuesday with a 3-2 victory which brought the overall score to 27-23. The two teams had been locked in combat since 5 June, in a double-round Scheveningen event in which the five members of each team played each opponent twice.
St Petersburg started well with a 3-2 victory in the first round, even though they all had Black that day as in all the odd-numbered rounds; and they raced to a 12-8 lead after four rounds with two further match victories and a single 2.5-all draw. But Beersheva fought back over the following three rounds to the tune of 10-5, thus taking an 18-17 lead with three to go.
The contest was effectively decided, though, in round eight in which St Petersburg used their White advantage to massive effect with a 4.5- .5 victory. And a 2.5-all draw, followed by their narrow last-round win, wrapped things up.
The individual scores were: (for St Petersburg) Khalifman and Yemelin 6.5/10, Sergei Ivanov 6, Lugovoi 4.5 and Aseev 3.5; while for Beersheva Avrukh made 6.5/10, Huzman and Greenfeld 5, Mark Tseitlin and Mikhalevski 3.
Today's game shows one of the interesting additional possibilities inherent in match play. In a murderously theoretical variation of the Grunfeld which I shan't even attempt to explain, Mikhalevski followed his team mate Mark Tseitlin's game from two days earlier for no fewer than 22 moves.
Tseitlin had played 23 ...c4 and after 24 Bb5 Qd8 25 Bxc4 b5 26 Bb3 he had a foul position though in fact Khalifman still hadn't worked out how to win when Tseitlin's flag fell on move 40 (the last move of the time control).
Mikhalevski varied with 23 ...a6 and then the splendid 24 ...Qd4+, the main point of which is that if 25 cxd4 Bxd2 26 d7 Bxd7 27 Bxd7 c4! regains the piece with a draw. But 31 ...Be4? lost invaluable time. 31 ...Be6 was correct intending ...f5 and ...Bf7 exchanging off the powerful bishop, though I wonder about 32 f5!? Bxf5 33 Kf2 Be6 34 Ke3 f5 35 Kd4 Bf7 36 Bxf7 Kxf7 37 Kd5. At the end 45 ...Ba5 46 Bc5 Bd8 47 Bb4 is decisive zugzwang.
White: Alexander Khalifman
Black: Viktor Mikhalevski
Grunfeld Defence
1 Nf3 Nf6
2 c4 g6
3 Nc3 d5
4 cxd5 Nxd5
5 e4 Nxc3
6 bxc3 c5
7 d4 Bg7
8 Rb1 0-0
9 Be2 Nc6
10 d5 Ne5
11 Nxe5 Bxe5
12 Qd2 e6
13 f4 Bc7
14 0-0 exd5
15 exd5 Ba5
16 d6 b6
17 Bf3 Bf5
18 Bxa8 Bxb1
19 Bc6 Bf5
20 Re1 Qf6
21 Bb2 Rd8
22 Re8+ Rxe8
23 Bxe8 a6
24 a4 Qd4+
25 Qxd4 cxd4
26 d7 b5
27 cxd4 b4
28 d5 Kf8
29 Bf6 b3
30 d6 Bd8
31 Bb2 Be4?
32 Kf2 f5
33 Ke3 Bc6
34 Kd3 Bxa4
35 Kc4 Bc6
36 g3 Bf3
37 Kxb3 Bd5+
38 Kb4 Bf7
39 Bxf7 Kxf7
40 Kc5 Ke6
41 Kc6 a5
42 Ba3 a4
43 Bb4 h6
44 h4 h5
45 Ba3
1-0
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments