Chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TODAY (WITH apologies to the devout) a short homily on chess and "sin". I always remember the deadly ones by my own mnemonic of "Pale Gas" - Pride, Anger, Lust, Envy, Gluttony, Avarice, Sloth - and while there are chess players who are enthusiastic practitioners of the first six (not so much Sloth since we're such a high- adrenaline lot), at the chess board itself the most common manifestation is a combination of Gluttony and Avarice in the form of an over-eagerness to win material, particularly pawn-grabbing.
Today's game from the Swiss League also has an admixture of Pride since Korchnoi's team Zurich had deliberately put him on second board in order to play King whom he had beaten twice previously; they had second-guessed Winterthur who had moved King down, precisely in an attempt to avoid Viktor! And some postprandial Anger as the loser stomped off, though we all feel that to some extent, after defeat.
In the opening, 11 ...Bxd4, which Viktor played very quickly, was rather rash. Instead 11 ...0-0 12 Qe2 Nxd4 13 Nxd4 Bxd4 is quite playable. For example my own game as Black against Michael Adams at Hastings 1991 was quickly drawn after 14 Bxh7+ Kxh7 15 Qe4+ Kg8 16 Qxd4 Nb6 17 Be3 Qxd4 18 Bxd4 Nc4 19 Ne4 b6 20 Rfd1 1/2-1/2.
14 ...exd5 isn't absolutely absurd though 15 Rae1+ Be6 16 f4 is very dangerous indeed eg Qb6+ 17 Rf2 0-0 (Black should try 17 ...0-0-0!) 18 f5 Bd7 19 f6 Rfe8 20 Bxh7+ Kxh7 21 Qh4+ Kg8 22 Qg5 Rxe1+ 23 Bxe1 and mate in a couple more moves.
But in the notes which he kindly e-mailed to me Dan suggests that 15 ...Qxd2 is more critical, eg 16 Rfd1 Qxb2 17 Bxc6+ Ke7! 18 Rab1 Qe5 19 Qb4+ Kf6 20 Rb3!? leads only to a draw after bxc6 21 Rf3+ (21 Re3 Qb5 doesn't change the result) Kg6 22 Rg3+ Kf6 23 Rf3+ Kg6 24 Rg3+ - but not 24 Qe7? h6 25 Qxf7+ Kh7 when Black is winning.
After 16 Rfd1 Black was already in serious trouble since if 16 ...Ne5? 17 Bg5!; or 16 ...0-0 17 Bb4! or 16 ...Nd4 17 Qc4 e5 18 Bb4! traps the king in the centre. So Korchnoi jettisoned his queen but King's calm technique prevailed without too many problems: along the way, if 20 ...b6 21 Qh3! while 35 Bxe7? Ba6! would have imperilled the win.
White: Dan King
Black: Viktor Korchnoi
Caro Kann Defence
1 e4 c6
2 d4 d5
3 exd5 cxd5
4 c4 Nf6
5 Nc3 e6
6 Nf3 Bb4
7 cxd5 Nxd5
8 Bd2 Nc6
9 Bd3 Be7
10 a3 Bf6
11 0-0 Bxd4
12 Nxd4 Nxd4
13 Qa4+ Nc6
14 Nxd5 Qxd5
15 Be4 Qd7
16 Rfd1 f5
17 Bg5 fxe4
18 Rxd7 Bxd7
19 Rd1 Rf8
20 Qb3!? Rf7
21 Qxb7 Rb8
22 Qc7 h6
23 Be3 Rxb2
24 h3 Rc2
25 Bxa7 e5
26 Bb6 Re7
27 Qd6 Rc3
28 Bc5 Rd3
29 Rxd3 exd3
30 Qxd3 Re6
31 a4 e4
32 Qd5 Ne7
33 Qc4 Kf7
34 a5 Bc8
35 Bb6 Ke8
36 h4 h5?
37 Qb5+ Kf8
38 a6 e3
39 fxe3 Kf7
40 a7 Bb7
41 Bd4 Be4
42 Qb8 1-0
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments