Bridge: Playing the wrong note
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.'WOULDN'T you have played it in the same way?' asked South after going down in his slam contract on this week's deal.
There was something about his partner's expression that suggested he might not have done, and was not sure why South had so played it.
Game all: dealer North
North
A 9 7 3
A 4
A 8
A K 7 6 3
West
J 5 2
9 8 6 2
K Q J 6
Q 10
East
Q
10 7 5
9 7 5 4 3 2
J 9 8
South
K 10 8 6 4
K Q J 3
10
5 4 2
Perhaps both partners did a little too much bidding but we have all played in worse slams than the Six Spades they reached.
West led the king of diamonds to dummy's ace and declarer took stock. A club loser seemed inevitable and everything would depend on how he tackled trumps.
A low spade from the table went to the queen and king and when West followed low to the next trump lead, South had a critical decision to make.
The Principle of Restricted Choice suggests that if East had started with queen-jack doubleton he would have been equally likely to have followed with either card.
With the singleton queen however, he would have had no choice. The fact that he had played the queen should have persuaded declarer to finesse.
Instead, after deep thought, dummy's ace was called for. When East showed out, declarer sighed and conceded one down, losing a trick in each black suit.
Playing the trumps as he did was inferior, true, but conceding one off was positively criminal. After winning with the ace of spades declarer should ruff dummy's diamond, cash the ace and king of clubs, and follow with four rounds of hearts, throwing clubs from the table.
Then he exits with a trump. West wins but now has to concede a ruff and discard and South's losing club goes away.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments