Bridge: Elegant defence brings success

Alan Hiron
Wednesday 27 April 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEITHER East nor West could be accused of being backward in the bidding on this deal from a recent pairs event, and it required an elegant defence for them to capitalise on the favourable lie of the cards.

Love all; dealer East

North

K 9 6 3

9 8

8 7 6 4

Q J 5

West

2

3 2

A 10 5 3

A 10 9 8 6 4

East

A Q 10 7 5

A 7 6 5

J 2

7 3

South

J 8 4

K Q J 10 4

K Q 9

K 2

Playing five card majors, East opened One Spade and South overcalled, reasonably enough, with Two Hearts. West (without really having the material for a bid) made a negative double, suggesting values in the unbid suits, to leave East with a horrid problem. He had already shown five spades, and held only two cards in each of the suits in which his partner was interested. Hoping for the best, he decided to pass.

West led the two of spades (clearly a singleton) against Two Hearts doubled, and East won with the queen. Rather than give his partner an immediate ruff, he made the far- sighted return of the two of diamonds - not the jack. South played the queen and lost to West's ace. West, who at this stage could hardly read the position, was able to return the three of diamonds to the jack and king.

Now declarer turned his attention to trumps, but East won the first round and, at last, cashed the ace of spades and gave his partner a spade ruff by leading the ten. It was a clear suit preference signal for a diamond, the higher-ranking side suit, and West cashed the ten of diamonds. This allowed East to discard the seven of clubs, and now the ace and another club gave East a club ruff to defeat the contract by three tricks for a top score.

It is worth noting East's switch to the two of diamonds, rather than the more obvious jack, which would have allowed South to cover with the queen, and make a diamond return by West a losing play.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in