Bridge

Alan Hiron
Sunday 06 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I AM not sure of its provenance but the following defensive problem has a neat and original point. Clearly the suggested solution does not guarantee the defeat of declarer's grand slam but it does not provide him with a certainty] South opened with a conventional Two Clubs and, after North's positive response of Two Hearts, rebid Two No- trumps to show both his hand type and a point count of 23-24. It was easy now to advance to Seven Hearts and South did well to convert to Seven No-trumps. As you can see, in the no-trump slam declarer can leave his decision of how to play the heart suit until the very end.

The lead of the ten of clubs was natural enough and East followed with the two, suggesting three cards in the suit. With every high card placed for him, West could see that declarer would have all 13 tricks unless he held precisely the 3-3- 3-4 distribution that he did.

After winning in hand, declarer started with three rounds of diamonds. Now, what should West discard? A club is safe and correct but it is not immediately obvious that a spade discard from the 4 3 2 would be fatal] Suppose West does part with a spade - South plays off the rest of his clubs and three rounds of spades.

By now West is marked with exactly five clubs, three spades, two diamonds and therefore three hearts. So, after cashing the king of hearts, declarer can finesse the jack of hearts with confidence. In just the same way, East cannot afford to part with a spade when the clubs are cashed for again this will enable declarer to complete his accurate count of the hand. But if neither defender ever discards a spade, South is left with a horrid guess at trick 12.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in