Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 14 July 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Love all; dealer South

North

4 K J 7 2

! A K J

# 8 7 6 3

2 Q 7

West East

4 A 8 3 4 10 9 6 5

! 10 8 5 3 ! 9 7 6 2

# 5 4 2 # J

2 K 6 3 2 J 9 4 2

South

4 Q 4

! Q 4

# A K Q 10 9

2 A 10 8 5

South failed to make his slam on this deal and two questions arose. Was declarer's line of play reasonable? And did West find the most punishing opening lead?

South opened One Diamond, North bid One Spade, and South rebid Two Clubs. The rot started when North over-elaborated with a fourth bid of Two Hearts (instead of a simple Three No-trumps) and the final contract was a shaky Six Diamonds against which West led a trump.

Declarer drew trumps in three rounds, crossed to dummy with a heart and led a low spade. His queen lost to the ace and there was no way to avoid an eventual club loser.

You can see South's plan. If East had held the ace of spades (and there were no clues as to where it lay), the losing spade could be discarded on a heart and the club losers restricted to one.

There was a flaw in South's reasoning. It would not have helped to find the ace of spades with East! A smart defender would go in with his ace on the first round and play a second heart, removing dummy's entry while the spades were still blocked. Therefore South should have tried a low spade from hand rather than dummy, playing West for the ace.

Finally, an initial heart lead would have defeated the slam - as long as West plays his ace when South leads a spade and continues hearts.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in