Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 27 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EXPLAINING A poor set to your team-mates at comparison time is somewhat of a delicate business. I am always worried when I hear those cries of "I'm afraid our card needs a little help!" or, more dramatically but more honestly, "We've had three bad boards" (followed by a short pause) "and five disasters!"

The result on this deal also required some explanation. After a hit-or- miss auction, our opponents played the North-South cards in Six No-trumps. We did not lead a diamond, the clubs broke two-two, and declarer had plenty of tricks. We anticipated the possible loss of an overtrick when we revealed our loss of 1,470 points.

"I'm afraid that we played it in clubs and they cashed the ace of diamonds at trick one," was the reply. "Nothing serious," I observed. "That's only three imps away." "Slightly more, I'm afraid," volunteered a guilty-looking South. "We lost 100 points."

There was a stunned silence, broken by one of our third pair (who was possibly still aggrieved at being "rested"). "Haven't you ever heard of Blackwood?" he said. "Yes, we used it and stopped in Six. However, I went and misguessed the trumps."

We studied the hand again - what was he talking about? Finally we extracted the full story. The final contract had indeed been Six Clubs played by South, and West had started by cashing the ace of diamonds. At trick two, however, he had found the baffling but (as it turned out) brilliant switch to the four of clubs!

This went to the queen and king, and suddenly South (who, a moment ago, could not possibly have gone wrong in the suit) had a losing option.

Had West, for reasons of his own, switched to a singleton trump and in so doing set the stage for South to pick up the suit without loss?

As you will have almost certainly guessed by now, declarer had, of course, finessed the 10 on the second round of the suit...

Game all;

dealer South

North

4A K J 10 5

!A K 7 4 2

#J

27 3

West East

44 2 4Q 8 7 6 3

!8 5 3 !J 10 9

#A 10 8 7 5 3 #9 6 2

2J 4 2Q 9

South

49

!Q 6

#K Q 4

2A K 10 8 6 5 2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in