Truth: A Guide For The Perplexed, by Simon Blackburn

Win some, lose some - you know it's the truth

Ian Pindar
Tuesday 30 August 2005 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Once upon a time, he tells us, philosophers believed in absolute truth. Then along came relativism, the doctrine that no truths are absolute. In Blackburn's analogy, a relativist is like an archer who shoots an arrow at a barn door, paints a target around it and claims a bull's-eye: "There is no success or failure in this game."

Blackburn sees the moving bull's-eye everywhere in the modern world. The Truth has been downgraded to "truth", in "sneer quotes". Much of this book is about long-running battles between absolutists and relativists. As Blackburn tells it, peace breaks out only when the quasi-realists arrive and suggest we should probably just get on with things. The truth remains a reasonable target, principally because it gets results. In the real world, there are winners and losers: winners draw up accurate maps and design mobile phones, losers read tea leaves and gaze into crystal balls.

An accomplished populariser, Blackburn uses topical examples, from global warming to fox-hunting, and has some nice bons mots. But he offers no statistical evidence for his conviction that there is a "stampede to weird faiths and strange cults". The vast majority are not undergoing Mayan rebirthing ceremonies or being probed by aliens.

Blackburn is a sensible man and wants people to be sensible. He hates astrology, homoeopathy, feng shui and self-help, and has the discriminating mind one might expect of a professor of philosophy at Cambridge. He is firmly in the analytical camp and misses no opportunity to take potshots at Continental philosophers, although he doesn't really engage with them. To his credit, he is unusually sympathetic to Nietzsche and is interesting on Wittgenstein, David Davidson and Richard Rorty.

In Blackburn's view, the quest for truth has utility: "By following scientific method, we get things that work." He wants philosophers to have confidence in the words they use, and to "take the postmodernist inverted commas off things that ought to matter to us: truth, reason, objectivity." After all, as Nietzsche observed, "Truth is the kind of error without which a certain species could not live."

Ian Pindar's biography of James Joyce is published by Haus

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in