The Moment of Psycho, By David Thomson

Director's cuts that made history

Reviewed,Roger Clarke
Tuesday 09 March 2010 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Jacobean tastes of Alfred Hitchcock, that working-class Englishman, have wormed their way into the cultural mainstream. Especially with Psycho, a film with a wavering sense of near-farce saved by the most brilliant musical score in movie history, by Bernard Herrmann. Go to see Martin Scorsese's new film, Shutter Island; you'll find Leonardo DiCaprio taking a shower. The shower head, a fully referenced Psycho flower of radiating water, is like an advancing medical instrument in an alien laboratory.

David Thomson recalls going to see Psycho as a film student, when he "posed against the social realism tendencies of the film school". He "was certain that Psycho was the film of the year", whereas his teachers praised Guy Green's The Angry Silence, "a story of union troubles in British industry". In a sense, Thomson has been fighting this cultural battle ever since.

Psycho proved one of Hitchcock's most successful films, and earned him a fifth Oscar nomination. So the contention that he somehow remained isolated and rebuffed by Hollywood does not quite ring true. How else could he have grabbed a 60 per cent share of the profits in his contract, earning himself about $4 million at the time: a near-James Cameron sum in adjusted figures? As Thomson notes, his majority ownership of the film also allowed him to instigate a completely new release pattern. Big premieres in LA and New York were followed by a mass release, simultaneously. Hitchcock also did another new thing in using his TV profile to make a very successful television trailer.

Scorsese borrowings aside, and the very obvious debts that many films owe to Psycho, Thomson's most interesting revelation in this study is of Psycho as a new business model for Hollywood. That, and the use of a lavatory. Apparently, the scene in the motel where a lavatory is flushed was quite shocking for audiences at the time. Perhaps the cloacal aspect of this most written about movie of all time is another book waiting to be authored.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in