The Master and His Emissary, By Iain McGilchrist

Lesley McDowell
Sunday 17 October 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Iain McGilchrist's ambitious and provocative study, subtitled "The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World", should send thinkers and cultural commentators into the stratosphere. In it, he not only seeks to marry neurological science with a history of Western art and culture, but also to argue that that link between the two is a negative one. It is not until the penultimate chapter, though, that he nails his colours to the mast and declares himself a Romantic, who deplores the Enlightenment's privileging of reason and rationality.

Why he deplores those values can only be horribly simplified in a short review, but here goes: Romanticism is "a manifestation of right-hemisphere dominance" in the brain; rationality is represented by the left hemisphere. Both hemispheres have aspects of each other, of course, but the lack of exact symmetry between the two has suggested a warring between them. McGilchrist argues effectively that we made a conscious choice, over time, to privilege one side of the brain over the other, and that we made the wrong decision. When the right hemisphere is incapacitated, he says, the left part of the body "ceases to exist"; whereas for the left hemisphere, the body is already "something from which we are relatively detached". That left-hemisphere detachment has prevailed in art and science since the Ancients, McGilchrist argues, presumably because it avoids the messiness of emotion, how we treat the body, and so on.

We live, he argues, "in two different types of world". It is a powerful argument to suggest that humans have been suppressing parts of the brain in the interests of the state, or organised religion, say; and it is also a fascinating one that has real implications for cultural shifts. This may well be a book that comes into its own in the years to come.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in