Paradise City by Elizabeth Day - book review: Moral fable of male rapacity doesn't quite hit home

A moral fable, concerned with issues of guilt, contrition and atonement

Stevie Davies
Tuesday 26 May 2015 17:29 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In a luxurious London hotel bedroom Sir Howard Pink, a self-made millionaire whose sense of entitlement hides flinching self-disgust, encounters a chambermaid, a Ugandan immigrant. As Sir Howard masturbates against Beatrice Kizza, "He cannot see her face but he knows ... that she is smiling... gagging for it".

Elizabeth Day's third novel addresses the theme of male rapacity that drove her debut, Scissors Paper Stone (2012). The story alternates four perspectives: Howard's and Beatrice's, and those of Esme, a young journalist hunting for stories and reputation, and Carol, a 65-year-old widow. In a highly constructed, slow-paced and over-detailed narrative, Day's story moves towards the convergence of the four plots. Each character is double, an everyday mask being twisted out of true in defence of an old wound.

Howard's contumacious, cold self is fuelled by grief for Ada, his "beautiful, edgy, neurotic, nineteen-year-old daughter", who vanished without trace years ago. Beatrice, the migrant worker whom he abuses, has previously suffered rape in her homeland and the loss of a beloved lesbian partner. When Esme, steeped in the betrayals of journalism, interviews "The guy whose daughter went missing", she's looking for copy but Pink's sorrow disarms her by triggering memories of her father's early death. "This is not your sadness," Esme tells herself. "But somehow it was." Day's portrayal of the queasy dubiety of a journalist's profession, wheedling out exploitable intimacies from interviewees, is highly convincing. Howard, depraved but conscience-stricken, is less adeptly realised.

The author's design aligns these disparate characters in a system of partial mirrorings. This is interesting and thought-provoking, undermining the reader's expectation of nemesis for the perpetrator. Beatrice is no supine victim but a survivor who "is sick of men getting away with it". When she recognises Pink's picture in the newspaper ("A millionaire... he should have paid her"), we think she'll go for his wallet. But to Beatrice, "pay" means a different form of recompense and restitution. Paradise City is a moral fable, concerned with issues of guilt, contrition and atonement.

Day's interest is in the melting moment of recognition when you step back into yourself, with a fresh illumination, reclaiming the softer you. That's lovely – but, given the degree of Howard's offence and the depth of insult Beatrice has endured, it seems too much to ask of the fable. Readers may feel that Paradise City's verdict on this rapacious millionaire is implausibly lenient.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in