Orson Welles, By Paolo Mereghetti

Christopher Hirst
Friday 13 May 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Astonishing value for money, this monograph on the legendary director is worth getting for the pictures alone. The double-page spreads include some of the most striking stills in the history of cinema: Welles and Joseph Cotten surrounded by bales of the New York Inquirer from Citizen Kane;multiple mirror images of Rita Heyworth from The Lady from Shanghai. Equally remarkable is a 1942 shot of Heyworth sitting next to Randolph Hearst, the resentful model for Citizen Kane. Five years later, at the fag-end of her marriage to Welles, Heyworth starred in The Lady from Shanghai. As Paolo Mereghetti notes, "The film ends with a devastating gesture of contempt for star status as the hero walks away from the dying Heyworth."

Subversion was a trademark of Welles. Throughout his career, he took traditional Hollywood vehicles and adapted them for his own ends. This even applied to Citizen Kane, "clearly related to the journalistic comedy, one of the most popular genres of the 1930s". Mereghetti describes how the disorienting opening of the film "destroys the 10 years of work that Hollywood had devoted to constructing in the viewer's imagination a coherent image."

The famous deep focus developed for Welles by cinematographer Greg Toland is viewed by Mereghetti as "a new symbolic form" to subvert the conventions of the medium. A simpler explanation might be that Welles was a fledgling director who wanted to use every trick in the book.

We learn that the battle scenes in Chimes at Midnight, Welles's 1966 Falstaff collage, "have an extraordinary visual power: 17 minutes of pure spectacle constructed from 392 different shots". As a graphic portrayal of warfare, it compares with the D-Day sequence in Saving Private Ryan. Yet even here, Welles subverts the drama of battle by cutting away to the blundering Falstaff. Clad in a preposterously vast suit of armour, Welles resembles nothing so much as a super-sized tin of corned beef. When the battle ends and the distractingly unsynchronised dialogue resumes, the magic is lost even with Shakespeare as screenwriter.

Contrary to received wisdom, Mereghetti maintains that Welles achieved his finest work towards the end of his career. His 57-minute movie The Immortal Story (1968), adapted from an Isak Dinesen story, is described as "an absolutely perfect film".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in