Going Buddhist by Peter J Conradi

Don't just do something - sit there

Justin Wintle
Wednesday 04 February 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Pascal, in the 17th century, suggested that the world's ills derive from our inability to sit quietly alone in a room. Reading this celebrated passage, I thought about Buddhism and its emphasis on solitary meditation, on disengagement. How different would everything be if it had taken hold in all those places where rivalrous monotheisms prevail?

Yet Pascal, who exhibited much of the scepticism he deplored, would have been quick to comment that staying contentedly indoors is to surrender everything outside to the virulent passions of others. Those countries that, at different times, have succumbed to Buddhism have been no less prone to violent strife than elsewhere. Even Tibet, routinely projected as a magical realm of peace, was riddled with corruption and bloodshed long before the Communist Chinese takeover, though perhaps never to the degree Buddhist Burma is today. The only difference is that, among Buddhist peoples, warfare has rarely been perpetrated in the name of faith.

Buddhism manifests other vulnerabilities. If, as the Buddha allegedly taught, the world and everything contained therein is illusion, it is by no means obvious why this should not apply to Buddhist doctrine itself. Again, the insistence upheld by many Buddhists that all things have an essence is faintly absurd. Ideas and concepts may have essences, but things (stones, cups, even an egg) are arguably just things.

Even so, Buddhism does exercise an enduring appeal, either because of its focus on the processes of thought itself, or because it represents a welcome alternative to the narrative, ends-driven traditions of monotheism. The vexatious questions surrounding the nature of God do not arise, while "the problem of pain" is met head-on. Buddhism acknowledges that suffering is endemic, however illusory; for all its abstractions, it seems anchored in the evidential.

The new book by Peter J Conradi (best known as Iris Murdoch's biographer) takes all of this and more on board. However, the blurb describing "a self-help book for cynics" is miscalculated. It is not that, but a finely turned, ruminative and cultured essay on what it is like to be a Western Buddhist.

Conradi does not describe a conversion. Rather, he was drawn gradually toward Buddhism in the 1980s, following a vaguely-described crisis that involved panic attacks. When these occurred, meditation, taught him by (among others) a relatively austere Tibetan master, provided as effective an antidote as any pharmaceutical preparation.

"Don't just do something," Conradi admiringly quotes the Vietnamese monk Thich Nhat Hanh: "Sit there!" Yet, west of the Pamirs, going Buddhist presents its own discomfiture, a sense of un-belonging that would not occur in Sri Lanka, say. Conradi remains sharply aware that his commitment remains minoritive, while being gay adds poignancy to his confession.

Yet he assures us that the cure for existential anomie found in Buddhism makes it worthwhile. Memorably, he identifies cynicism and mysticism as the effective poles of our mental being. Martin Amis and Christopher Hitchens (responsible for "demythologising" Mother Teresa) are among the few who expressly test his patience. Conversely, Iris Murdoch looms large as a surrogate master, for all that she half-wishes Conradi would wear a crucifix during one of his many retreats.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in