Bookie Gambler Fixer Spy, By Ed Hawkins

 

Simon Redfern
Sunday 24 November 2013 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ed Hawkins has already won the 2013 Wisden Cricket Book of the Year Award, and on Wednesday is aiming to do the double, as his investigation into cricket corruption is shortlisted for the William Hill Sports Book of the Year.

It seems appropriate that a book about bookies is in contention for the Bookie Award, and it is there entirely on merit. Hawkins has two advantages over many of those who have pronounced on the canker of match-fixing: he travelled to India to talk to illegal bookmakers; and as a specialist betting journalist he understands the mathematics, and can spot a suspicious shift in odds at 50 paces.

His most astonishing revelation concerns the India v Pakistan 2011 World Cup semi-final in Mumbai. One of his bookmaker contacts tweeted him a “script” of how the game would unfold: “India will bat first and score over 260, 3 wickets fall within the first 15 overs, pak will cruise to 100, then lose two quick wickets, at 150 they will be 5 down and crumble and lose by a margin of over 20 runs.” The tweet was disturbingly if not totally accurate, and later number-crunching indicated that the odds of a game following that pattern were 405-1, but the International Cricket Council said they had “no reason or evidence” to investigate it.

Closer to home, Hawkins queries the conviction of the Pakistan cricketers involved in the 2010 News of the World sting and, more worryingly, suggests that the increased televising of English county cricket in South-East Asia and the Middle East represents a clear and present danger. Most of the evidence Hawkins rehearses is ultimately circumstantial, but a chill runs down the spine when he quotes a big Delhi punter as saying: “I know one county player who had £100,000 deposited into a Dubai account. He had a big party.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in