Afterwards, by Rachel Seiffert

Guilty secrets of the past

Katy Guest
Friday 02 February 2007 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In the story of Joseph, a young man suffering from post-traumatic stress, Seiffert returns to many of the themes of her first novel, The Dark Room: guilt, grief, memory and forgetting. But Afterwards also asks the questions about how much people can really know the people they love.

There are many kinds of love in the novel. There is the complicated love of daughter for father; the protective love of grandparents for their only granddaughter; the unconditional love of brother and sister. But the lovers in the story are Alice and Joseph. They meet in a pub, and tentatively, unremarkably, fall in love. But each has a past that makes really getting to know each other a struggle. Alice has been rejected by her father not just once, but twice. Joseph is tormented by his time as a soldier in northern Ireland.

Alice's beloved grandmother has just died, and Joseph offers to help her grandfather by redecorating his house. Curmudgeonly David opens up to this young soldier, in ways he never has to his family. But what he shares opens wounds in Joseph, and makes Alice wonder if she has ever really known either of them.

Dialogue in the novel is telling. Conversational boundaries are vague, with reported speech mingling with direct speech and internal monologue. Sometimes it can be confusing, but the technique shows that sometimes it is unclear just what has been said. The women, in particular, are guilty of trying to read each other from silences. When men talk to each other, they don't say much, but at least they get it said.

As a nurse, Alice is used to more intimacy. Only Joseph's sister seems content to leave him alone with his guilt. Alice and her mother want to know the men they love - whether the men like it or not.

Perhaps the women feel excluded from the history that the men have been part of. In the end, the only woman who seems to have come close is Alice's grandmother, and she has taken the secrets of her long marriage to her grave. Alice, who had always felt sorry for her grandparents, suddenly realises "that something more had been passing between them, in all that time." Finally, perhaps she understands them, after all.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in