Paperback review: The Day Parliament Burned Down, By Caroline Shenton
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The day that Parliament didn’t burn down despite the best attempts of Guy Fawkes, 5 November, has overshadowed somewhat the day that it actually did.
On 16 October 1834, John Phipps, assistant Surveyor for London in the Office of Woods and Forests, was required to clear out tally foils in the Exchequer buildings, and a huge batch of wooden tallies, or “nick-sticks”, was collected and subsequently burned in the furnaces of the Houses of Parliament. Phipps’ clerk, Richard Woebly, instructed Joshua Cross to load the sticks on in small amounts. But something went wrong during the day and the load eventually combusted, with the result that the medieval buildings housing valuable records, such as the collections on the Upper Library, as well as tapestries and other art work, went up in flames.
Shenton’s fascinating history considers the responses of the fire-fighting teams of the age, as well as the people’s general reaction. Many were delighted to see Parliament take a hit, viewing it as a judgement from God for passing the controversial Great Reform Act in 1822. Architects and radical politicians who had long campaigned for new buildings were also less than sorry. It was a shocking incident nevertheless, “one of the greatest archival disasters the United Kingdom has ever known”, and was subsequently captured in paintings and watercolours by Turner and Constable (although Londoner Charles Dickens somehow failed to write it up at the time). And even those who were glad to see the fire didn’t want the great Westminster Hall to be destroyed, or the famous Painted Chamber, which dated back to the time of Edward III. It did bring about change however, so something good came out of the wreckage – the new buildings gave women their first opportunity to view Parliamentary proceedings.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments