US bookshop offers Go Set A Watchman refunds over false marketing as 'nice summer novel'
Brilliant Books has said the novel is a draft and should be viewed as an academic accompaniment to To Kill A Mockingbird, rather than 'Harper Lee's new novel'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A US bookshop is offering customers a refund on Harper Lee’s Go Set A Watchman after what it calls the “disappointing and frankly shameful” marketing of the novel.
Brilliant Books in Traverse City, Michigan, has said that “dozens” of customers are owed refunds due to the book being advertised as a “nice summer novel” rather than an “academic insight”.
In a post on its website, the bookshop said: “We at Brilliant Books want to be sure that our customers are aware that Go Set A Watchman is not a sequel or prequel to To Kill A Mockingbird. Neither is it a new book. It is a first draft that was originally, and rightfully, rejected.
“The book, and some of the characters therein, are very much a product of this era in the South.”
Brilliant Books suggests the release of Harper Lee’s novel, which was written before To Kill A Mockingbird in the mid-Fifties but lay undiscovered, should have been treated like James Joyce’s Stephen Hero, the original draft for A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.
“Hero was eventually released as an academic piece for scholars and fans - not as a new ‘Joyce novel’. We would have been delighted to see Go Set A Watchman receive a similar fate.”
Reviews of Go Set A Watchman have highlighted the novel’s sketchy form, with The Independent’s Arifa Akbar writing: “It is a rough draft, but more radical and politicised than Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird.”
Brilliant Books’s owner Peter Malkin said the book’s marketing by the publishing world as “Harper Lee’s New Novel” had been misleading.
“Maybe we’re cynical, but it all pointed to a desperate attempt to get folks to buy the book before they realised what it actually was,” he told independent publisher and blogger Melville House.
“We believe Go Set A Watchman should have been an academic piece for scholars and fans, as we said. Not marketed as the next big thing.”
Malkin said the bookshop will continue to sell Lee’s novel: “We are a bookstore, so we couldn’t not carry it, but we do explain to folks what it is, so that they buy it with their eyes open.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments