Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Historian says sorry for fake reviews

Mike Dodd
Saturday 17 July 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Orlando Figes, the historian, is paying damages and costs to two academics after they issued libel proceedings against him.

The case came after it emerged that Professor Figes, from Birkbeck College, University of London, posted poor reviews of books by fellow historians Dr Rachel Polonsky and Professor Robert Service, on the Amazon website.

Initially his wife, Stephanie Palmer, shouldered the blame for the reviews. But it emerged that Professor Figes wrote them himself, using the pseudonyms "Historian" and "Orlando-Birkbeck".

By then Professor Figes had issued legal threats to academic colleagues, literary journals and newspapers that suggested he might have written the reviews. His lawyer had also initially denied that he was the author and threatened legal action.

As part of the settlement agreed yesterday, Professor Figes, 50, has circulated an apology and retraction in which he accepts that his denial of responsibility for the reviews was false.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in