Authors' word choices create unique 'fingerprints'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The number of different words an author uses compared to the length of the work creates a unique, identifiable "fingerprint," according to a study published December 10 in the New Journal of Physics. Using such a calculation could answer questions about works with unknown authors and help to discover lost literary works.
With Thomas Hardy, D. H. Lawrence, and Herman Melville as their test subjects, scientists at the University of Umea in Sweden identified patterns in the authors' style based on the frequency with which they used new words. Analysis showed that these patterns were unique to each author used in the study. (Herman Melville, for example, was found to use a larger vocabulary than Thomas Hardy.)
The researchers also looked at the speed at which this new-word usage drops off over the course of a work, finding that the drop-off rate varied between the three authors but was consistent across each author's entire body of work.
Using this stastical analysis, a work by an unknown author could be compared to previous, known works in order to find a fingerprint match.
http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/11/12/123015/njp9_12_123015.html
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments